Reader Motion Form

Reader's Name *

First

Last

Reader's Email *

Reader Assignment *

• First Reader
• Second Reader
• Third Reader

Reader Motion Form for *

• Substantive Change
• Institutional Review

Name of Reviewed Institution *

Institution Category *IIIIIIIVV

Current Status *

• Candidacy
• Accreditation
• Reaffirmation I
• Reaffirmation II
• Reaffirmation III

Status Sought *

• Candidacy
• Accreditation
• Reaffirmation I
• Reaffirmation II
• Reaffirmation III

Proposed Institutional Change Request: *

Reader's Recommendation: Based on our review of the history of the institution, the institutional Change Request documentation, the Institution's Response, and the Recommendation by TRACS Staff, we, the Readers, move that the Accreditation Commission take the following action:

• Approve the Proposed Institutional Change without the requirement of a Compliance Report
• Approve the Proposed Institutional Change with the requirement of regular Compliance Reports. All Recommendations must be satisfied by the date specified below
• Approve the Proposed Institutional Change with the Conditions listed below
• Defer Approval of Proposed Change based on the reason(s) listed below
• Deny Approval of Proposed Change based on the reason(s) listed below

All Recommendations must be satisfied by *

Condition(s) *

All Recommendations must be satisfied by

Further, the institution must document compliance with the Condition(s) by

Deferral reasoning *

Denial reasoning *

The most recent Evaluation Team identified:

Number of Finding(s) *

Number of Recommendation(s) *

Number of Suggestion(s) *

After review of the Institutional Response, Staff determined that the institution remains out of compliance with:

Number of Finding(s) *

Number of Recommendation(s) *

Number of Suggestion(s) *

Based on my/our review of the institution's Self-Study documents, the Evaluation Team Report, the institution's response and the recommendation by TRACS staff, I/we, the Reader(s), move that the Accreditation Commission take the following action: *

• Grant the Institution the status sought effective as of specified date below.
• Defer granting the institution the status sought because of serious institutional weaknesses. Specifically the institution does not demonstrate compliance with the following Institutional Eligibility Requirements and/or TRACS Standards. (Provide IER's or Standards below)
• Deny the institution's request for the status sought. Specifically, the institution does not demonstrate compliance with the following Institutional Eligibility Requirements and/or TRACS Standards. (Provide IERs or Standards below)

Grant the institution the status sought effective as of: *

• Retroactively to the first day of the current academic term
• Other Date (specify below)

Compliance Report Requirement(s) *

• Regular Compliance Reports on "In Process" Recommendations and Suggestions are required
• No additional Compliance Reports are required
• If checked, Financial Monitoring Compliance Reports required until date specified below

Other effective date *

Provide IERs or Standards for Deferral *

Provide IERs or Standards for Denial *

Submit